2

  Theories  aid constitute over than presenting examples—they as-well constitute political  problems, and twain types of examples can be linked in reference to client  issues. For in, abundant scholars and political workers own attempted to  interpret the political example of want. Turner and Lehning (2007)  classified sundry subjective theories to illustrate want subordinateneathneath two  headings: (1) individual-related theories or (2)  structural/cultural-related theories. In other signification, reflect of these two  headings as lenses in viewing want. In this Discussion, you employ  lenses through which to subordinateneathstand a client's example in reference to  political examples. To prepare: Read this designation listed in the Learning Resources: Turner, K., & Lehning, A. J. (2007). Subjective theories of want. Journal of Human Behavior in the Political Environment, 16(1/2), 57–72. doi:10.1300/J137v16n01-05 Select a supposition subordinateneathneath the individual-related theories and a supposition subordinateneathneath the structural/cultural-related theories.  Complete the handout “Comparing Individual-Related and Structural/Cultural-Related Theories” to aid you intrigue your retort. (Note: You do not want to upload the handout to the Discussion forum. The handout is intended to help you in agreement your Discussion support.) Post: Describe how a political worker would conceptualize a presenting example of want from the two theories you selected.  Explain how this conceptualization be-unlikes from an individual-related versus a structural/cultural-related hypothetical lens. Compare how the two hypothetical lenses be-unlike in provisions of  how the political worker would advent the client and the example and how  the political worker would intervene.  (disjoined condition) Evaluate two attested ability and one attested  limitation your coadjutor may combat when employing an  individual-related supposition and a structural/cultural-related supposition to formulating interventions for want.