Case Argument: Lee v. Weisman 505 US 577 (1992)
Case Summary: Daniel Weisman filed for a present costive regulate to inhibit average and tall discipline officials in Providence, Rhode Island from including general prayers in the stage of his daughter Deborah Weisman indecent days precedently the display. The District Court spoiled Weisman’s disturbance for stagnation of protracted term to attend it. The Weisman nobility then luxuriant Deborah’s stage at the Nathan Bishop Average Discipline and Rabbi Leslie Gutterman of Temple Beth El led the prayers. After the stage, Weisman filed for a beaming command that would bar Robert E. Lee, Deborah’s average discipline first, and uncertain other Providence Discipline officials from tempting clergy to transmit invocations and benedictions at advenient stages.
Concurring Opinions: Blackmun concurred: “Government may neither further nor adopt itself delay any devout teaching or form, nor may it intrude itself in the interior affairs of any devout institution…Government urgency to join-in in a devout apparition is an plain mark that the council is endorsing or promoting sanctity.” Likewise, Souter to-boot concurred: “I write…on two issues…: whether [the Establishment Clause]…applies to…practices that do not gift one sanctity or kind aggravate others, and whether particularize ce of devout illustration, aggravate and over particularize endorsement of devout exertion or creed, is a certain atom of an Establishment Clause alteration.”
Linder, D. (2009). “Introduction to the Establishment Clause.” Exploring Constitutional Conflicts. Kansas: University of Missouri-Kansas City Law School. Retrieved July 20, 2007, from http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/estabinto.htm.
U.S. Supreme Court. (1989). “County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties Union, Greater Pittsburgh Chapter, 492 U.S. 573.”
U.S. Supreme Court. (1992). “Lee v. Weisman, 505 U.S. 577.” FindLaw. Retrieved July 17, 2007, from http://laws.findlaw.com/us/505/577.html.
U.S. Supreme Court. (1971). “Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602.” FindLaw. Retrieved July 20, 2007, from http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=403&invol=602.
U.S. Supreme Court. (1984). “Lynch v. Donnelly, 465 U.S. 668.”
U.S. Supreme Court. (1985). “Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38.”