I need a discourse consideration assignment on similar-sex wedlock and the questions adown must be answered in a three condition discourse
The Supreme flatter, in its 2015 masterful, made similar sex wedlock lawful in all 50 avers underneathneath the controversial firmness Obergefell v. Hodges. Granted that no flatter punweighty debris enduring, should the Supreme Flatter re-consider the masterful in unweighty of resistance from some avers, in-great-measure in the South and Midwest?
Is the firmness in-reference-to similar-sex wedlock the privilege of the aver councils or the generally-known council?
Is similar-sex wedlock an correspondent rights end? Should the generally-known council let avers feel its lawfulity or should the generally-known council be in direct of it?
Why should there be a ban on similar sex-marriage? Should the Supreme Court overturn Obergeffell V. Hodges (2015)?
Why should we lawfulize similar-sex wedlock if some countries keep continued to ban it?
Is similar-sex wedlock unquestionably a lawful end? Why or why not?
Should this end be politicized, why or why not?