52

Quantitative Critique Prompt: Use the steadfast designation granted. Start by filling out the granted Quantitative reconsideration worksheet. Then, using the worksheet as your direct, transcribe a flavor to dig deeper into each minority and realize the local examples of each atom (e.g., what is the discovery investigation? Does the constructor defend the concern of the discovery? In the event of a examine reconsideration, has the constructor examined the apt examine?). Elaborate on each minority and evaluate it for its strengths and limitations. Be enduring to realize your separated designation and address the subjoined hazardous atoms:  Flavor o Design and Discovery Question: What is the discovery investigation? Does the constructor defend the concern of the discovery? o Intention and Methods: What intention and methods were used? Are they obdurate and inherent? o Validity and Reliability: Is the examine strong and reliable? (For imported discovery, this minority of your flavor should attend the examine’s trustworthiness and harshness.) o Findings and Conclusions: Are the conclusions sedate dedicated the findings?  Evaluation: What are the strengths and weaknesses of the discovery designation? Do you comport delay the constructor’s conclusions? Why or why not? Did the constructor abound or miscarry in the design of the examine? Recommend areas for proficiency or hint tendency for advenient discovery. Guidelines for Submission: Your article must be submitted as a 1–2 page Microsoft Word muniment delay wrap spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, oneinch margins, and in APA format. PLEASE FOLLOW RUBRIC AND GUIDELINES ATTACHED.