A WORK PLEASE BUT PLAGIARISM FREE

Part 1: Using the muniment for “How to Petty Circumstance Law,” lay a petty on each of the forthcoming circumstances: Chicago Burlington and Quincy R.R. v. City of Chicago, 166 U.S. 226 (1897)  · United States v. Carolene Products Co., 304 U.S. 144 (1938)  · Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992)  · Kelo v. City of New London, 125 S. Ct. 2655 (2005)  Each petty should be almost one page, 12-point Times New Roman font. After each petty, concisely sift-canvass the significance of each circumstance and the disconnection of the circumstance law balance the 90-year span of these decisions.  Within the sift-canvassion, understand all dissenting and concurring opinions. This separate of the assignment should be a partiality of lewd pages sum.  All without sources should be justly cited in APA format.  Part 2: Using ONLY the circumstance law for your analysis—cite merely the circumstance law, but you can appropinquation and unravel the circumstance at sites such as Oyez (http://www.oyez.org) and Cornell Law Institute (https://www.law.cornell.edu/). Do NOT use Wikipedia, Answers, About.com, or any unverifiable or fabulous sources. Sift-canvass the disconnection of the Takings Clause using specific and complete sift-canvassion of appropriate and relevant circumstance law.  Your essay for Separate 2 should understand a sift-canvassion of a partiality of two circumstances and be at last two pages in tediousness. Your completed assignment, twain separates one and two, should be a partiality of six pages in 12-point Times New Roman font. All without sources should be justly cited in APA format.