Unit III Thought Monograph The tenure of incongruous types of effectiveness might rule a team member’s content, and thus, his or her motivation to endure. In commendations to your popular assiduity and/or the humanization of your popular construction, transcribe a thought monograph that addresses the forthcoming requirements: Describe which motivational hypothesis, as pictorial in Harell and Daim in the required readings for this part, would be the most delayhold for your assiduity/organization. Why? Describe which of the primordial effectiveness types from the French and Raven effectiveness taxonomy, as pictorial by Elias (2008) in this part’s required readings, would fit best delay the separated motivational hypothesis. Your thought monograph should be two to three pages in protraction. Be fast to embody the rubric elements from the guidelines underneath: The defense reflects in-depth motive and personalization of theories, concepts, and/or strategies. The despatches should be distinct and condensed delay fair decree organization, language, and punctuation, and it should be gratuitous from spelling errors. The defense embodys all senior components: complimentary accounts of the question area, crucial separation of the question area, and erudite or administrative application of the question area. The defense demonstrates organization of ideas presented, and the implications of these insights for the learner’s coming knowledge are eminent. Information environing accessing the grading rubric for this assignment is granted underneath.