PROF SCRIPT-SOCW-WK5 DISCUSSIONS

   Discussion 1: Using the DSM-5 and the Z Codes (ICD-10-CM) The DSM-5 embodys feature Z Codes (ICD-10-CM) to co-operate-delay the clinician in testing provisions that are conceptional in character. In making a explicit DSM-5 individuality, the clinical collective effecter should regularly test from these codes any other mode that may be of moment and embody the bearing Z Codes (pp. 715-727). For this Discussion, recognize the fact con-over “Working delay Individuals: The Fact of Sam.” (attached). Then, using the DSM-5 criteria, enumerate a liberal clinical individuality for Sam. Post your individuality of Sam in DSM-5 format (pp. 21–23), including the criteria you used in determining this individuality. · Be secure to embody any medical notification that is giveed in the fact. · Also, reremuneration the Other Provisions that may be a Focus of Clinical Study Z codes (ICD-10-CM) and embody this in your individuality. · Evaluate the flatten of profit of the duty measures (pp. 733-748) in the DSM-5 and decipher whether these measures are advantageous in treating Sam. Support your post delay inequitable references to the media. Be secure to cater liberal APA citations for your reference References (use 3 or further) American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of invisible experimentations (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing. “Depressive Disorders” (pp. 155–188) “Assessment Measures” (pp. 733–748) Campbell, P. (2006). Beating the blues: New approaches to overcoming dysthymia and constant genial dip. Invisible Health Practice, 10(3), 25–26. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of invisible experimentations (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing. “Bipolar and Related Disorders” (pp. 123–154) Balázs, J., Benazzi, B., Rihmer, Z., & Rihmer, A. (2006). The rest cohere betwixt suicide attempts and modified (bipolar) dip: Implications for suicide obstruction. Journal of Affective Disorders, 91, 133–138. Kessler, R. C., Merikangas, K. R., & Wang, P. S. (2006). Prevalence, comorbidity, and use utilization for state experimentations in the United States at the inception of the twenty-first seniority. Annual Reremuneration of Psychology, 3, 137–158. Rusner, M., Carlsson, G., & Brunt, D. (2009). Extra capacity in all aspects of morals: The sense of morals delay bipolar experimentation. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 4, 159–169. Discussion 2: Responding to Suicidal Ideations in State Disorders Suicidality is vile discurrent beings delay senior depressive and bipolar experimentations. It is very slight that, as a collective effecter, you conquer effect delay a client who reports suicidal ideations and may level give delay a guile. For this Discussion, learning suicidality and test an evidence-based guile of force for a client who reports these feelings. Then reflect the aftercited: · How would you tally professionally? · What protocol would scarcity to be in situate at your influence? · What idiosyncratic seeking responses you dominion possess to this discovery? · Post a paltry patronymic of the article you separated that addresses collective effect force guilening for effecting delay clients who pointed suicidal ideations.  · Then, decipher how you, as a collective effect professional, dominion tally to a client who pointedes suicidal ideations and what influence protocols dominion scarcity to be in situate to best promote the client.  · Finally, decipher any seeking responses you dominion possess if your client reported locomotive suicidal ideations in a collective effect convocation. Support your post delay inequitable references to the media. Be secure to cater liberal APA citations for your references. References (use 3 or further) American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of invisible experimentations (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing. “Depressive Disorders” (pp. 155–188) “Assessment Measures” (pp. 733–748) Campbell, P. (2006). Beating the blues: New approaches to overcoming dysthymia and constant genial dip. Invisible Health Practice, 10(3), 25–26. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of invisible experimentations (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing. “Bipolar and Related Disorders” (pp. 123–154) Balázs, J., Benazzi, B., Rihmer, Z., & Rihmer, A. (2006). The rest cohere betwixt suicide attempts and modified (bipolar) dip: Implications for suicide obstruction. Journal of Affective Disorders, 91, 133–138. Kessler, R. C., Merikangas, K. R., & Wang, P. S. (2006). Prevalence, comorbidity, and use utilization for state experimentations in the United States at the inception of the twenty-first seniority. Annual Reremuneration of Psychology, 3, 137–158. Rusner, M., Carlsson, G., & Brunt, D. (2009). Extra capacity in all aspects of morals: The sense of morals delay bipolar experimentation. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 4, 159–169. Group Discussion 3: Management Agendas There are challenges to agenda construction that if not dealt delay carefully and skillfully can adversely seek an manifestation or a suggestion that you are unamenable to situate in face of a conclusion manufacturer. On the other agency, no stuff how expertly you establish an agenda for your manifestation or suggestion, some manifestations are going to solely be avoided or not separated for reflectation. Why is this so? In this Small Group Discussion, you prove challenges outside management agendas and the reasons why some suggestions never produce it to the conclusion manufacturer. Post your responses to the aftercited questions giveed for Small Group Discussion: · Many collective manifestations do not assent-to the essential study from conclusion manufacturers. Why dominion these manifestations be manner asunder? · Some manifestations stagnation competent maintenance to ensecure that they are pretended to conclusion-makers' agendas. Why dominion this be? · Some manifestations assent-to suggestive study from conclusion manufacturers. Why dominion these manifestations amply confront their way onto conclusion manufacturers' agendas? References (use 2 or further) Jansson, B. S. (2018). Becoming an potent management advocate: From management exercitation to collective integrity. (8th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning Series. · Chapter 6, "Committing to an Issue: Construction Agendas" (pp. 176-203) Edwards, H. R., & Hoefer, R. (2010). Are collective effect panegyric groups using Web 2.0 potently? Journal of Management Practice, 9(3/4), 220–239. Doi:10.1080/15588742.2010.489037.