Be secure to harangue all tonnage of the subject-matter doubt as most bear multiple tonnage. A verifiable exoteric fact (hither than 4 years old) applicable to at last one of the subject-matters you accord to is a essential ingredient of your essay as well-behaved. You cannot use advice from the passage size or any size/article by the constructor of the passage size as a exoteric fact. Make secure that your allusion has a duration of notification. For the essay you are required to perceive and grasp at last one allusion and allusion passage to a exoteric fact hither than 4 years old (a allusion delay no duration (n.d.) is not grateful) in response to at last one doubt. This requires a allusion passage in the passage of your response and a allusion at the end of the doubt to which the allusion applies. You must grasp some advice obtained from the allusion in your response. The allusions must be establish on the internet and you must grasp a URL in your allusion so that the allusion can be identified. The passage should be in APA format. It should be at last 2 pages.
(a) Identify and narrate three disagreement (unique) germinative collective and holy concerns (not mentioned in our passage) arising as a end of converging technologies. (b) Defend your response. Please concoct (further a yes or no response) and afford your “theoretical” rationale in influence of your responses. (knowledge)
Evaluate the arguments that were examined for and despite coming learning in nanotechnology. Given the germinative advantages and disadvantages of coming fruit in this area, which side’s arguments do you perceive more convincing? Dothe criteria affordd by Weckert for when learning in a point area should and should not be allowed adduce us any guidelines for learning in nanotechnology? Which kinds of holy guidelines demand to be built into learning and fruit in this room? Please concoct (further a yes or no response) and afford your “theoretical” rationale in influence of your responses. (comprehension)