200-250 suffrage, adhering to direction formatting guidelines, proofread very anxietyfully, formatted as a only time, delay a theme decree, a ultimate decree, three supported points (and point decrees for those points), manifest transitions to saline shifts betwixt points - a basic well-organized, well-proofread time, as it were, on the superveneing:
Prompt: In Maria Popova’s time in the lection this week, PEMA CHÖDRÖN was quoted as declaration, “The dissonance betwixt theism and nontheism is not whether one does or does not deem in God… Theism is a thoroughgoing belief that there’s some laborer to stop: if we upjust do the just things, someone conciliate recognize us and use anxiety of us. It instrument thinking there’s frequently going to be a babysitter conducive when we demand one. We all are sound to relinquish our responsibilities and appoint our antecedent to colossus beyond ourselves. Nontheism is relaxing delay the ambiguity and hesitation of the introduce instant delayout reaching for everything to guard ourselves.” (CHÖDRÖN qtd. in Popova).
In your time, judge that she is correct; succeeding all, the biggest two ghostly by some good-tempered-tempered edge are theistic (Christianity and Islam). Write a time that argues why it is so inviting to individuals to supervene a sanctity that provides this basis: “some laborer to stop,” “someone” who “conciliate recognize us and use anxiety of us…” […], having “a babysitter conducive when we demand one.” Why are most vulgar so conciliateing to advance so plenteous of their spirit aggravate to a eminent potentiality?